enter meta description here
Home | Contact Us | Tell a Coalition Member | Search | Member Area
 About CPRS
 Mission
 Fact Sheet
 Members
 Join CPRS
 News & Reports
 Mandatory Coverage
 GPO
 WEP
 System Reform
 Member Profiles
 Plan Members
 Associate Members
 National Partners
 Other Advocates
 US Congress
 Congressional Links
 Member Resources
 Member Updates
 Coalition Toolkit
 Links
 Change Login
 CPR ADMIN
 Board of Directors
 Meetings
 Financial Statements
 Bylaws
 Awards
 Headquarters
 
Bush Should Drop Personal Accounts Requirement, 2001 Panel Member Says

A member of the 2001 Commission to Strengthen Social Security that produced the reform model on which President Bush is largely basing his reform plan this week suggested that Bush drop his insistence that he will not sign a Social Security reform bill that does not include personal accounts.

"Given the lack of bipartisan support for carve-out personal accounts, the president should not insist on carve-out accounts if the Democrats support an overall legislative package for Social Security reform that is otherwise satisfactory to him," Robert Pozen, chairman of MFS Investment Management, said on May 19.

A day earlier, Pozen had been quoted as saying he "would advise the president to say that carve-out accounts are no longer required," a comment many Democrats seized on as indicating a new-found opposition to personal accounts.

Pozen, a Democratic member of the 2001 panel appointed by Bush, has been a tepid supporter of personal accounts, preferring to focus instead on measures needed to restore solvency to Social Security. He is the architect of a Bush-backed "progressive indexing" model under which Social Security benefit growth would slow for all but lower-income retirees.

In Congress, meanwhile, the House Ways and Means Committee and the panel's Social Security Subcommittee began hearings in May on Social Security reform. Ways and Means Chairman Bill Thomas, R-Calif., has indicated that he plans to craft legislation that would address not just Social Security, but broad retirement issues, including long-term care insurance and ways to encourage saving among lower-income Americans. This approach is being interpreted by some observers as an effort to pick up votes that would not be cast for a bill that focuses only on personal accounts.


Printer-Friendly Format